SC253-11

https://www.oftwominds.com/blogmar22/autocracy-weakness3-22.html

Autocracy's Fatal Weakness

The various flavors of autocracy (theocracy, kleptocracy, dictatorship, etc.) look remarkably successful at first blush but they all share a fatal flaw. To understand the flaw we must start with the dominant dynamic of all organisms, natural selection.

Things change. Those organisms which adapt quickly and successfully survive, those that don't perish. Things change for many reasons and over different timespans. Drought slowly but surely makes regions unlivable for all the but hardiest creatures. A meteor strike can ruin an entire species' prospects.

I try not to get too philosophical here, but bear with me because this is an important point: selection isn't teleological, meaning that selection isn't working toward a goal or end-point, it is entirely contingent, solely responsive to the environment that exists today. There is no "plan" guiding what's selected to what we imagine is "better;" what's selected is whatever offers an advantage given the selective pressures of the moment. If water is scarce, mutations that enable the organism to get by on less water have selective advantages.

DNA, RNA, epigenetics and human cultures generate random mutations (i.e. a variety of experiments), and those that offer a beneficial response to a selective pressure are selected and eventually spread through the gene pool or populace.

A funny thing happens when adaptation and evolutionary advantages are snuffed out: whatever can't change expires as what was functional in the past becomes dysfunctional as things change.

Autocracies view change they don't directly control as a threat to their power, which is absolutely correct: any change outside the autocrat's control can end up toppling the autocracy as waves of change ripple outward and interact with various systems. One domino falls and topples many others, and soon the entire system is no longer within the control of the autocrats.

You see the problem here: adaptation is necessary for survival, and successful adaptation requires a steady churn of random experiments which are left to run so that the best are selected and conserved and the failures set aside.

But the churn of random experiments is anathema to autocracies, which must control everything lest their power be disrupted. So the autocrats want control of all the experiments and of the selection process. They will select whatever they judge to be supportive of their power and their regime.

But that's not how successful adaptation works; that's how unsuccessful adaptation works. The very act of controlling everything disables the entire process of evolutionary churn and adaptation. Choosing what's selected based on a limited and thus fatally distorted view of what will support the autocratic status quo also disables adaptation.

Autocracies cannot allow evolutionary churn to operate freely enough to enable their regime to adapt to changes. By throttling evolutionary churn--dissent, variety, experiments across the board in all fields--autocrats doom their regime to failure and collapse. The irony is their tight grip on power is their undoing.

Autocrats have a second fatal flaw: they want agreement and confirmation, not dissent. Once the autocrat decides that this set of policies will support the regime's control, then dissent is unwelcome.

This desire for compliance and consensus dooms the autocracy to failure and collapse because dissent is the essence of evolutionary churn and adaptation. Surround yourself with sycophants and toadies, crush dissenting views, and you've sealed the fate of your autocracy:

Eventually a meteor strikes and the least adaptive organisms and regimes expire. You can fool Nature for a time with brute force, but autocratic force is no match for evolutionary churn and the fast adaptation only available to those who welcome and reward liberty, experimentation and dissent.

The more dramatic the change, the greater the selective pressure. If we're entering an era of massive, non-linear disruption, those who have crippled their evolutionary churn as a threat will be the first to collapse--no matter how mighty they appear in the moment.

....

https://corbettreport.substack.com/p/globalists-release-timeline-for-health

Globalists Release Timeline for Health Tyranny

One thing you learn after spending years in the conspiracy realist space: when the globalists tell you that something is about to happen, you'd better believe they're hard at work behind the scenes to make that "prediction" a reality.

For example, when 9/11 suspect Philip Zelikow takes to the pages of Foreign Affairs to "warn" about the "eminent threat" of "Catastrophic Terrorism" that, "like Pearl Harbor," will "divide our past and future into a before and after," you'd better believe his neocon cronies are about to deliver a 9/11 to the public.

When Bill Gates "warns" us that "we're not ready" for what he calls "the next epidemic," you'd better believe that he's using his monopolization of global "health" to prime the pump for the COVID scamdemic.

When Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping release a joint statement vowing to "accelerate the implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development" by cooperating on "key areas" like "vaccines and epidemics control, financing for development, climate change, sustainable development, including green development, industrialization, digital economy, and infrastructure connectivity," you'd better believe they are actively collaborating on the promotion of an AI-driven, Fourth Industrial Revolution globalist agenda with their WEF cronies.

And when the globalists release a detailed timeline telling you exactly what the next steps are in the rollout of the global biosecurity security state, you'd better believe they are hard at work erecting that enslavement grid as we speak.

Luckily for us, we do not need to be mind readers or fortune-tellers to know what the globalists are preparing for our dystopian future. We simply have to read their documents. And boy, have they released some real doozies in the past month: three documents that lay out a precise timeline and an overview of what they're hoping to achieve and how they're hoping to achieve it.

Today, let's examine these documents so that we can better understand what we're up against and form a more effective plan for derailing this agenda of control.

DOCUMENT #1: The European Council's Handy-dandy Infographic Timeline

Earlier this month, the European Council released a document laying out the EUreaucrats' own timetable for the implementation of global health tyranny. Entitled "Infographic - Towards an international treaty on pandemics," it cuts down on all those complicated linguistic thingies—what do you call them again? words?—and reduces the complexities of a legally binding global pandemic treaty down to the lowest common denominator: the "infographic."

With this Buzzfeed-worthy gimmick in hand, the European Council wastes no time in getting down to business, informing us that "On 3 March 2022, the Council adopted a decision to authorize the opening of negotiations for an international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response" before patting itself on the back for its role in proposing the idea of a global pandemic treaty in the first place:

So far, so unsurprising. This is the exact kind of mealy-mouthed "global approach" blah blah blah "common cause" yadda yadda "protecting health" pabulum that you would expect the global technocratic class to administer in a document like this.

Then, they lay out an incredibly abbreviated history of how we have arrived at the proposal for a global health tyranny:

You'll note that this curiously truncated "history" unhelpfully informs you that 2021 was "only the second time in WHO history that its governing body . . . met for a second time in the same year" without bothering to link you to the list of World Health Assembly meetings. If they had bothered to do so, as I do here, you could see for yourself that the first time this two-meetings-in-one-year event happened was back in 2006, when the WHO met in May to discuss "Strengthening pandemic-influenza preparedness and response" in the context of the newly revised International Health Regulations and then again in November of that year to appoint Margaret Chan as the organization's Executive Director.

It's not hard to understand why they leave out that part of the history, though. Not only would it be too much information to include in their childish infographic, it also might have prompted you to learn more about the creation of the "public health emergency of international concern" that lewas then invoked by Chan during the ginned-up swine flu "pandemic" of 2009 (and again during the ebola "pandemic" of 2014) to justify the consolidation of WHO powers in the dawning era of biosecurity. And, obviously, that kind of history is not what the European Council is aiming for here.

Back to the document:

Next, we see what is really at stake in this seemingly innocuous proposal for a global pandemic treaty. We learn that what is really being proposed is not that political blather about "banding together for a common cause" but creating a legally binding agreement to govern the global response to global public health "crises" (real or imaginary). Don't worry, though, this agreement—in addition to promoting the sharing of genetic data and samples among WHO member countries—is rooted in the constitution! . . . The WHO constitution, that is, not your silly, outdated national constitution. This agreement will override that.

At last, we arrive at the juicy part:

And so we discover the real roadmap for the creation of the biosecurity state as the European Council sees it. First there will be a meeting of an "intergovernmental negotiating body" to discuss progress on a draft for the globalist "health" takeover. "What body? Representing which governments? Convening under what authority? And represented by whom, exactly?" you might ask, if you were the sort to question the information that is forcibly shoved down your throat by the self-proclaimed authorities. But relax, dude! This is an infographic, not one of those complicated overly talky explainer doohickeys! Just turn off you mind, relax and float downstream with the European Council and whoever else is steering this ship!

Next we learn that this "negotiating body"—"Is this an official body? Who gets to decide who is appointed to this body? Is it part of the WHO itself?" . . . but there you go again with those pesky questions—will deliver a "progress report" to the WHO's annual-ish meeting next year. (Now don't go asking what this progress report will consist of, how it will be delivered, who will review it or what these unnamed officials will do with it! That's way more information than these poor infographic designers could possibly supply you with!)

And then, in May 2024, the "proposed instrument" will be presented for adoption at the WHO's World Health Assembly, and the biosecurity takeover will be complete. Think of it as Patriot Act 2.0, but global. And focused on medical martial law.

Finally, our friends at the European Council put our minds at ease about why a legally binding global agreement is needed after all:

You see, it's just about keeping you safe in the loving arms of the de facto global health tyranny so that they can implement long-term fascism at all levels! Nothing to see here, right?

So there you have it, folks: we have two years left before they close the barn door on health freedom at the global governmental level. At least, according to the European Council.

But why listen to the EU, you might ask? Good question. The simple answer is that they have a track record of correctly "predicting" the next moves in the erection of the medical martial law grid. Remember when the European Commission released the snappily named "Roadmap for the Implementation of Actions by the European Commission Based on the Commission Communication and the Council Recommendation on Strengthening Cooperation against Vaccine Preventable Diseases" back in 2019? No? Well, let me refresh your memory:

Ahhh, right. It just so happens that the EUreaucrats were forecasting the creation of a vaccination card/passport for EU citizens in 2022 just months before the scamdemic was launched. Coincidence, I'm sure.

DOCUMENT #2: A Roadmap for Living with COVID

But, to be sure, it isn't just the European Council talking about the coming biosecurity grid, and we don't have to rely on some contextless, sourceless, idiotic infographic to learn what the globalists are planning next.

We could turn, for example, to "Getting to and Sustaining the Next Normal: A Roadmap for Living with COVID."

This is a document from . . . who exactly? Well, according to the "About" page on the website, this 136-page report on our coming medical martial law nightmare was put together by some unnamed group of random individuals. Apparently, they all woke up one day filled with concern for Americans in the COVID era and decided out of the goodness of their hearts (and with the help of a bit of Rockefeller funding) to write a handy-dandy roadmap for getting us to what they call the "next normal." And which random good Samaritan took on the role of "shepherding" (their word) the 53 authors of this report? None other than Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Vice Provost for Global Initiatives at the University of Pennsylvania and former Biden Transition COVID-19 Advisory Board member.

Yes, that Ezekiel Emanuel.

The document is precisely as disturbing as you would expect, laying out step-by-step exactly how to hardwire the biosecurity state into place through the creation of centralized testing, surveillance, data sharing, monitoring and reporting standards. It also calls for the development of new technologies and processes for combating the inevitable next pandemic.

But if all that wasn't Huxleyan enough, the report also advocates the creation of "a comprehensive, scientifically-tested communication and behavioral intervention infrastructure to increase vaccination, testing and treatment" and . . . wait for it . . . the creation of a new post on the National Security Council: Deputy Assistant to the President for Biosecurity! (And you thought I was joking about biosecurity being the next paradigm, didn't you?)

DOCUMENT #3: National Covid-19 Preparedness Plan

Equally disturbing is the Biden White House's own "National Covid-⁠19 Preparedness Plan," unveiled earlier this month.

Purporting to be a plan for "getting America back to our normal routines while protecting people from COVID-19, preparing for new variants, and preventing economic and educational shutdowns," the document is broken down into four goals:

    Protect against, and treat, COVID-19

    Prepare for new variants

    Prevent economic and educational shutdowns

    Continue to lead the effort to vaccinate the world and save lives

Worryingly, many of the creepy aspects of the biosecurity state embedded in this particular plan are already being implemented. For example, on page 34 of the document the US surgeon general is directed to "issue a Request for Information (RFI) from researchers, healthcare workers, tech platforms, and community organizations on the impact of health misinformation during the pandemic."

As The New York Times reports, this request has now been issued:

    President Biden’s surgeon general on Thursday formally requested that the major tech platforms submit information about the scale of Covid-19 misinformation on social networks, search engines, crowdsourced platforms, e-commerce platforms and instant messaging systems.

    A request for information from the surgeon general’s office demanded that tech platforms send data and analysis on the prevalence of Covid-19 misinformation on their sites, starting with common examples of vaccine misinformation documented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    The notice asks the companies to submit “exactly how many users saw or may have been exposed to instances of Covid-19 misinformation,” as well as aggregate data on demographics that may have been disproportionately exposed to or affected by the misinformation.

Meryl Nass summarizes the bone-chilling nature of this request nicely in a recent Substack post on the topic:

    The feds are asking for detailed information about the demographics 'exposed to misinformation.'  You know that obtaining the names of who is reading what is their next step.

    Furthermore, read the last paragraph in the NY Times article below, closely.  The feds want citizens to start 'sharing' information on misinformation.  Isn't that sweet?  This is how they dress up the Stasi in 21st century euphemism to encourage ratting out your friends and neighbors.

Given what we have just seen taking place in Canada around the doxing and financial de-personing of the Freedom Convoy supporters, can there be any doubt that the systems are now being erected so that thoughtcriminals will be penalized for sharing "misinformation" about the next scamdemic?

CONCLUSION

The COVID narrative has fallen apart in recent months and the mockingbird repeaters of the MSM have refocused the attention of their zombie-like viewers onto the spectacle in Ukraine, but the biosecurity agenda has not gone away. Indeed, as Kit Knightly warns in his latest insightful article at Off-Guardian, the "stealth omicron" scare story that is being floated in the media right now reminds us that the COVID narrative has not gone away; it is merely sleeping for now.

Regardless of what happens next in the continuing COVID saga, though, the erection of the biosecurity state continues apace. In fact, it is even helped along by the fact that so few are paying attention to this agenda now. Distracted by the pyrotechnics of warfare, the hoi polloi hardly notice that the European Commission is happily announcing their imminent victory in the war over the formerly free peoples of the world. By 2024, if all goes well, they will have their global pandemic treaty in place and absolute power to implement their will anywhere in the world at any time under the cover of any declared health emergency.

If you had sprung any of this (literally any of it) on the public two years ago, it would have been swiftly and roundly rejected. Today, it is simply accepted that this is happening. After all, it is the next logical step in the narrative of "pandemic and recovery" that the masses have been brainwashed with for the past two years.

The social engineers know what they are doing. They are wearing the population down, first generating hysteria over a perceived crisis and then slipping in the poison pill once the public's attention has turned elsewhere.

This suggests, once again, that our perception and attention are themselves important. They cannot implement their agenda without our acquiescence, so they spend unbelievable amounts of energy propagandizing the public, preventing information about their true agenda from circulating among the public, and working to distract the public. And, once again, this suggests that the work we are doing in pursuing this information and sharing it with others is an important part of stopping the would-be rulers from erecting their biosecurity state.

However, this also implies that if we cannot raise sufficient awareness of this agenda among the general public then we will surely lose this fight.

The choice is ours. We can either go back to sleep and follow the shiny baubles of the latest breaking news on the MSM news feeds or we can continue to focus on the creation of the biosecurity state, build coalitions with those who are resisting it, and move forward with the creation of a parallel economy for overcoming our reliance on the state's tools of coercion and control.

I know which of those two options I'll be choosing. I hope you'll be here with me.

( images of graphics at the web link for this article )