SC94-8

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22903415&postID=5664376292542592563

eyeballs said...

RE Pandemic

The current financial scam, of which bailouts, wars and drug trafficing are large components, pits a few very clever, highly empowered elitists against the mass of humanity. More than ever before, the masses are educated and informed enough to perceive the scam. More than ever before, the victory of the elite must be total, or end in bitter failure. More than ever, the ruthless pursuit of this war on Earth by the political/ecomomic elite threatens very near-term disaster for all life forms on the planet, including the Wall Street crowd itself. Therefore, the masses must be restrained from resisting, and given the present rising tide of resistance, we can expect much sterner measures.I don't think they can pull it off, worldwide, with military alone. Perhaps the media hypnosis will suffice, as it has through better times. But perhaps these measures will not be enough. Think like a plutocrat: How could you keep five or six billion people docile and confused while you stole their farmland, their homes, their pensions, their public institutions and their future? I would say mass drugging would be in order.What delivery system would efficiently get a disempowering substance to the majority of the world's people? I cannot believe in the chem-trails hypothesis, which states that THEM is deliberately spraying mind-altering aerosols over the entire surface of the Earth. It's just not cost effective. You could put it in grain, or some common powdered recreational chemical, or coffee, but the treated batch would only affect thousands or millions. Mandatory innoculation around the world pretty much answers the question. This does not mean that the H1N1 shot is such a disempowering chemical, but if mandatory innoculation can be established throughout the world, eventually, one shot or another could be "the one". I suppose yearly worldwide innoculation would not only enrich the drug companies but keep the people wazzed out on a regular basis.Of course, innoculation could make people succeptible to another cause of death (such as hot weather or pollen or some common industrial chemical) and thus lead to depopulation. But neutron bombs are available for this purpose if THEM ever decides to get rid of the useless eaters. Forced innoculation is perfect for creating a docile population, though: if you can jab them with a sharp object on the basis of your authority, and inject them with an unknown substance, you have probably established a relationship from which control will be enhanced. But if that substance also weakens resistance in some psychoactive way, you would also buy some more time to ream the system.Whether it's getting the mark of the Beast on your forehead or getting the mandatory jab in the arm, I recommend being somewhere else when the government comes calling. And any resistance we can give to others being subjected to this is well worthwhile.If the population around us is buns-up to the oppressor, we are not going to change the economy, stop wars, relocalize the food system or accomplish any other valuable, systemic work. A no-brainer is resisting mandatory innoculation, even if it means chancing the flu.